Chereads / Where is Justice for Blessed? / Chapter 4 - The Transcript

Chapter 4 - The Transcript

Q. As you will see, the statement is not signed or dated. 

I wonder if you could be happy to sign and date it now 

if you believe that the contents and statement are true?

A. Yes

Q. It is the 2nd June today then there are other statements 

that I have you is entitled referring to her name

A. Yes

Q. That is a seven-page document?

A. Yes

Q. I would be grateful if you could verify that the 

contents are true to the best of your knowledge, and then 

sign and date?

A. On every page?

Q. Would the panel be satisfied-----

CHAIRMEN: the final page will be fine.

All the documents which were signed and dated were 

taken and accepted as evidence by the NMC.

A lot of questions were asked to her by the panel with 

regards to the investigation, and some of the evidence 

remained in a draft form. It was mentioned also, that it 

was believed she had taken on a full-time contract with 

the home.

Q. I just want to be clear about this policy document: 

where is it kept and how it is it transmitted to people 

working for the Trust?

A. The policy documents are all kept on the Trust 

internet in the policy section under the Human 

Resources Policy.

Q. And when would someone, who is working for the 

Trust, be introduced to this policy?

A. There is a sort of online list of policies that some of 

you must be aware of. I am not fully versed on the carer's 

break policy, and whether it is one that you have to say 

that you have read or whether it is just one that is listed 

and need to be aware of. When this was discussed, it 

transpired I was a not given this policy as it was not 

available during that time, and I was not given a copy as 

the manager informed the panel.

The discussions were made addressing the carer's break 

policy, and no live policy was upheld within the 

disciplinary process because there was no actual 

working policy at that time.

Barrister: Questions and Answers

I just want to ask some questions by your classifications. 

Now very helpfully you just answered a question 

regarding the sessional contracts, with my learned friend 

but can I ask you this.

Q. Where would she sign on a contractual basis, to say 

that she had that sessional contract as well as the fulltime contract; would there be a contract for that?

• For the sessional shifts there is a separate kind of 

appointment form that is signed the sessional contract was help prior to the career break, because 

can hold full-time contract with the Trust and then 

a sessional contract to do some extra shifts on top 

of the career break so she would have been working on that sessional contract that already existed.

Q. So, would that be a contract for her full-time post and 

a separate contract for her sessional post?

A. Yes. 

Q. Okay, we have talked about documents, so just for 

clarification, there is an Employment Break Policy?

A. Yes, I think that is what it is called, yes.

Q. And we have seen that at page 108, well, I think it 

actually starts a bit earlier than that in the contract? 

Where do you find that?

A. I think, in terms of when… That wording is possibly 

not…when I was giving the statement, I was referring to 

a specific policy the Trust, move it was clear---

Q. Well, you said in your statement "the trust policy on 

secondary employment is quite clear…" so what policy 

are you referring to?

A. I have not…because there was not a Working Times 

Policy live, which again in the disciplinary 

investigation, because this was at the early stages and 

my understanding that the Trust policy, but then when 

we completed the investigation , as the investigation 

report outlines, there is not, other than the Career Break 

Policy where it states an (sic)would not normally be able 

to take employment somewhere else. There was another 

policy where I could that it stated. So that was in the 

initial statement when I had spoken to the NMC but I 

was at early stages of the investigation.

Q. So the only place where you would find the policy on 

secondary employment is in the Working Time Policy 

(the Weaver Policy), is that correct or I am mistaken 

about that?

A. I do not … off the top of my head I do not know. I 

can remember in terms of whether, in the Waiver Policy, 

it has in it there.

Q. Well, let us just have a look at that then, it is at page 

88. That starts page 1 0f 8 at the bottom "Working Time 

Policy" and that is where the director and the staff side 

lead have been signed something. I presume that is for 

everybody.

A. Yeah, the issue with this policy was that this policy 

was not live at the point that this all took place which was why it was not acknowledged that this policy would 

not have been available and was not live at that point.

Q. Right, so Ms Kearns could not have checked about 

the Working Times Policy then at that point?

A. No.

Q. Where is says I am in particular page, 93 that is in 

the section "The 48 Hours Working Week"?

A. Yeah that is correct. So, during the process of the 

investigation, that is where it became clear that this 

policy was not live, therefore, it was acknowledged, 

within the investigation report and therefore, at the 

disciplinary that this, although it states it in this policy it 

was not live at the time therefore it was not fact.

THIS IS A TRANSCIPT FROM THE MNC WHEN 

I ATTENDED

Q. Now you say she also had a contract for full-time 

employment and part-time employment, is there any 

mention in any of the contracts about secondary 

employment, working times, that she would be directed 

to or would have available to her that you are aware of?

A. No, I did. As part of the investigation, I did look at 

the contracts to see whether there would be anything, 

but we did not find anything, which is why it was 

obviously not the…

Q. Right. Perhaps we can just have a look at that 

contract on page 76… so this is the "Terms and 

Conditions of employment". Now is not signed or date 

and this a copy.

Regarding issues relating work:

Q. There is a member of that Ms Kearns was having 

some issues with and her name was not mentioned 

directly and was asked if he was aware of this?

A. I was aware of there was having some issues sort of 

equally from both sides but not that that in anywhere 

linked to the career break or that there had been sort of 

current issues that time but there had previously been 

difficulties which had addressed in relation to both of 

them and equally sort on both sides it was difficult,

Q. It is correct, is it not there was some questions over 

whether you were the appropriate person to investigate 

this case, given that you were this this member of staff 

line manager?

A. Yeah that is correct.

Q You agree with that as we can that page 24 that is the 

report .You see there at the top, " it felt like the BK and 

SA that is (sic) was appropriate that MD investigate this 

case on grounds that MD was the line manager…. And 

would not be impartial. "However, it appears like you 

did continue to investigate.

A. Yes that decision was not made by me. That decision 

was made elsewhere.

Q. No, yes, I can see that. And just for clarification at page 

68 which is the interview with Ms Kearns we can see that 

she actually mentioned, in June---and I am looking at 

particularly at page 70 now the very top of page 70 where 

Ms Kearns said "I love my job in T/H. There have been 

pockets of lots of issues between me and … name not 

given . You that is MD" that is … was aware of some 

things. It was not done in a nice way. I felt this is why I 

asked for career break. I came and asked for a career 

break at the end of November / December time ". Then 

you said later down the page half down. I understand 

there were difficulties, but name not given So there was 

some admission then that the reason was that she was 

feeling in her words picked on and you were aware that 

there were difficulties between them.?

A. Yes

Q. We know and Ms Kearns admits it, some issues 

…sorry that she did ask for as for a career break 

because her partner in being up in Manchester having 

been unwell and had been aware of that had you?

A. I had been aware sort of several years earlier that her 

partner had been unwell and obviously, at the time of 

career break it became--- I was then aware that again he 

was unw okay .Now it is correct, is it not following all the 

investigations and disciplinary Ms Kearns is now 

working back at the Trust? T/H.

A. Yes at T/H but my understanding is Blessed has not been 

back into work since the disciplinary but some reasons.

Q. so, she told you the nature of the health condition?

A. We did not go into lots of detail but just that he was 

unwell having sort of further tests and needed—she 

needed to be with him to support him at that time.

Q. Thank you. I relation to working back-to-back shift, 

is that acceptable?

A. No guess would never roster somebody to work that. 

We would never expect somebody to work that we 

would never allow somebody to work that. But there is 

not anywhere stated that not working time policy neither 

at the time and there neither stated whereby that's not 

allowed so it was only on the reasonable ness which is 

why was only partially up held.

Q you are answering a wrong question to the one I asked a

A. sorry

Q. I think you have you have your management hat on, 

and I am asking is working back-to-back shifts 

acceptable? I am asking the "Working times Policy", I 

am asking you.