Republic of Dorogne Supreme Court
No. 04-2054
ZERO-ONE COUNCIL v DOROGNE DRUG SAFETY ADMINISTRATION
FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT, ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE DOROGNE COURT OF APPEALS
LADY CHIEF JUSTICE ANASTASIA FARRINGTON delivered the opinion of the Court.
The question stated in the case is whether the soldiers from the newly assigned RadiaNt Order dedicating their lives injecting blacklisted drugs or Nonpharmaceutical drugs are guaranteed no charge under the XV Amendment aka Civilian Discretionary Drug Safety Amendment which was created by the same respondent and stated that the right of every person to take the said drugs with the provision of the government is highly acceptable. The respondent Dorogne Drug Safety Administration asserted that these drugs have nothing to do with the betterment of the army and the soldiers taking drugs that are blacklisted is highly unethical and it goes against the VII Amendment aka Drug Efficiency Amendment which states that usage of Nonpharmaceutical drugs should be considered as illegal and unprincipled.
Decision
The latter case of Frederick v Dorogne Drug Enforcement Agency, 104 RUS 243, established the VII Amendment aka Drug Efficiency Amendment which stated that usage of unprescribed drugs should be considered illegal and unethical and with the lack of evidence supporting the XV Amendment, it has been disputed. We resolve that the use of blacklisted drugs or Nonpharmaceutical drugs will not be protected under the XV Amendment.
Therefore, we resolve that people including military personnel taking Nonpharmaceutical drugs administered by any organization without the provision of the government will benefit nothing from the established parliamentary law for legislatures and therefore, be eligible to be taken into custody.
So ordered.