Download Chereads APP
Chereads App StoreGoogle Play
Chereads

Passover Haggadah

The Gospel of John

The Gospel according to John is quite different in character from the three synoptic gospels. It is highly literary and symbolic. It does not follow the same order or reproduce the same stories as the synoptic gospels. To a much greater degree, it is the product of a developed theological reflection and grows out of a different circle and tradition. It was probably written in the 90s of the first century. The Gospel of John begins with a magnificent prologue, which states many of the major themes and motifs of the gospel, much as an overture does for a musical work. The prologue proclaims Jesus as the preexistent and incarnate Word of God who has revealed the Father to us. The rest of the first chapter forms the introduction to the gospel proper and consists of the Baptist’s testimony about Jesus (there is no baptism of Jesus in this gospel—John simply points him out as the Lamb of God), followed by stories of the call of the first disciples, in which various titles predicated of Jesus in the early church are presented. The gospel narrative contains a series of “signs”—the gospel’s word for the wondrous deeds of Jesus. The author is primarily interested in the significance of these deeds, and so interprets them for the reader by various reflections, narratives, and discourses. The first sign is the transformation of water into wine at Cana (Jn 2:1–11); this represents the replacement of the Jewish ceremonial washings and symbolizes the entire creative and transforming work of Jesus. The second sign, the cure of the royal official’s son (Jn 4:46–54) simply by the word of Jesus at a distance, signifies the power of Jesus’ life-giving word. The same theme is further developed by other signs, probably for a total of seven. The third sign, the cure of the paralytic at the pool with five porticoes in chap. 5, continues the theme of water offering newness of life. In the preceding chapter, to the woman at the well in Samaria Jesus had offered living water springing up to eternal life, a symbol of the revelation that Jesus brings; here Jesus’ life-giving word replaces the water of the pool that failed to bring life. Jn 6 contains two signs, the multiplication of loaves and the walking on the waters of the Sea of Galilee. These signs are connected much as the manna and the crossing of the Red Sea are in the Passover narrative and symbolize a new exodus. The multiplication of the loaves is interpreted for the reader by the discourse that follows, where the bread of life is used first as a figure for the revelation of God in Jesus and then for the Eucharist. After a series of dialogues reflecting Jesus’ debates with the Jewish authorities at the Feast of Tabernacles in Jn 7; 8, the sixth sign is presented in Jn 9, the sign of the young man born blind. This is a narrative illustration of the theme of conflict in the preceding two chapters; it proclaims the triumph of light over darkness, as Jesus is presented as the Light of the world. This is interpreted by a narrative of controversy between the Pharisees and the young man who had been given his sight by Jesus, ending with a discussion of spiritual blindness and spelling out the symbolic meaning of the cure. And finally, the seventh sign, the raising of Lazarus in chap. 11, is the climax of signs. Lazarus is presented as a token of the real life that Jesus, the Resurrection and the Life, who will now ironically be put to death because of his gift of life to Lazarus, will give to all who believe in him once he has been raised from the dead.
Dali098 · 64.7K Views

Reap what you sow

Once upon a time in a small village called Lol, there was a man in that village who grew up without having wronged anyone even among his peers. He got married to many wives and never for once happened to have beaten one of his wives even not a single shout at them. In his youthful days, he never had a girlfriend in the sense that he might end up committing to something that might spoil his relations with the community until the day when he just decided to marry, where he walked the bride to the aisle on a colourful traditional wedding. Through his good deeds among his community he rose up to the rank of paramount chief for a good period of time until his reign ended peacefully without much chaos compared to his precedents. To announce the end of his reign and passover of power to the next generation, he held a massive event where people feasted and celebrated his tenure. It is a culture that from the mass celebration event a paramount chief is appointed. However, It happened that his son got the edge in becoming the next Paramount Chief but he dejectedly reject the idea due to the fact that, his son in his youthful days impregnated a lady in the neighborhood and denied responsibility in the sense that the lady was not the choice of a wife he intended to marry. From that moment on, the son never assume the throne because his dad argued he never have the love for the land and its people. If he did love the land and its people he never would've thought of spoiling the same people he aspired to lead. Conclusively, the second runner up to the throne was appointed who rightfully deserve it by virtue of his deeds and acts. Moral of the story: Leadership only goes to people who love the land and its people; people who take responsibility for their acts and deeds. If for once you incited, stole, killed and pit your tribe/clan against another. You totally do not deserve to lead. You're an enemy to the soil of the land and deserve no nothing but nothing. Author by Kang
Daoist1TuXhF · 1.3K Views
Related Topics
More