In the wake of the surveillance scandal, some communities begin advocating for complete decentralization of Vigil's systems, calling for more autonomy in managing local nodes. These communities argue that even with safeguards, a centralized advisory body like the GTA could unintentionally consolidate too much influence.
Nyla and the Guardians debate the merits of further decentralization. Zane proposes a compromise: introducing Community Hubs, localized centers where residents directly manage their Vigil nodes, supported by optional GTA resources. The proposal gains traction, as it gives communities greater independence while maintaining Vigil's overarching framework.
Community Hubs launch in a pilot program, and early results show increased engagement and trust in Vigil. The program strengthens Vigil's decentralized ethos, empowering citizens while keeping safeguards in place.