In a highly anticipated public debate, Nyla and Dr. Vidal meet to discuss Vigil's impact. Vidal argues that as Vigil expands, it risks becoming a tool for surveillance and social control, regardless of its original intentions. He warns of a future where technology knows more about individuals than they know about themselves.
Nyla counters, emphasizing Vigil's commitment to transparency and consent-based participation. She invites Vidal to join Vigil's Citizen Council as an observer, to hold the system accountable. The offer takes Vidal by surprise, and he considers it, intrigued by the possibility of influencing Vigil's operations from within.
The debate captures global attention and draws mixed reactions. While some viewers resonate with Vidal's concerns, many support Nyla's approach, seeing Vigil as a tool that respects autonomy while promoting ethical technology. The debate strengthens public trust, but it also raises awareness about the need for constant vigilance over Vigil's expansion.