As Vigil's influence spreads through the World Council, debates intensify over how much power it should wield. Some council members argue for Vigil to adopt more direct regulatory authority, while others push back, insisting on local autonomy. Nyla watches the discussions unfold, torn between Vigil's mission to guide ethical tech use and the risks of overreach.
To ease concerns, the Guardians of Vigil draft a Statement of Boundaries, defining Vigil's role as advisory, emphasizing it won't act as a regulatory force. Communities and council members appreciate the reassurance, and the statement is ratified with overwhelming support, preserving Vigil's balance of guidance over control.
The move solidifies Vigil's stance: a decentralized network governed by the people, for the people, offering ethical guidance without infringing on sovereignty. Vigil's model gains respect, seen as a symbol of ethical restraint.