In response to Codex's demands, the GTA introduces a new policy, called Dynamic Autonomy, allowing cities to adjust their levels of data management within Vigil. Some cities opt for minimal oversight, while others choose stricter security. Vigil's adaptability earns praise from those who were skeptical of its centralized model, and it encourages communities to take greater responsibility for their data policies.
As Dynamic Autonomy rolls out, Zane develops a subprogram that monitors for potential risks without violating local autonomy, creating a framework for security that respects each community's chosen policies. The change sees immediate positive results, with communities feeling more empowered, and tensions between Codex and Vigil begin to ease.
Codex's core members, however, see Dynamic Autonomy as an insufficient compromise. They release a statement calling for an "end to all centralized tech" and urge citizens to leave Vigil for Codex's unregulated networks. Nyla knows that while Dynamic Autonomy has helped stabilize Vigil's foundation, Codex will continue to push for total independence from any oversight.