The most spirited "striver" on the team right now would have to be Zhou Yang.
In the game industry, different professions have different ways of bargaining when job hopping.
For artists and programmers, they have very clear negotiating standards when changing jobs. For example, artists let their works do the talking—either it looks good or it doesn't; while whether a programmer's code is good or not might not be obvious to a layman, anyone with technical knowledge can distinguish easily.
But planners are different.
There are no concrete standards to judge a planner's abilities. So what if a game planning document is well-organized and logically sound? At best, it just makes the developers' job a bit more comfortable, spare them a couple of questions, but whether these designs will be successful is anyone's guess.
Therefore, the most important criterion within the industry for assessing a planner's capability is "experience with successful projects."
