Two days later, a local television program devoted to public welfare broadcast an interview.
The footage still showed the old city's slum area, and the interviewees, of course, were residents thereof.
However, unlike last time, this time none of the interviewees attacked the real estate company. Instead, they disclosed a lot of damning information about the residents who had caused trouble before.
For instance, some people particularly enjoyed snitching onions from others' gardens, or picking fruits that others had planted, or even taking more than their share when the Government Office distributed welfare benefits; there was also a litany of issues like mother-in-laws bullying daughters-in-law or shortchanging in business dealings.
These were all trivial matters, with no names named. Although the interviewees' faces were pixelated, the broadcast still sparked widespread discussion among the citizens.
Moreover, the host's concluding remarks were also thought-provoking.
