[EntertainmentKing: Oh? You're taking action too? Wouldn't it be more effective to frame it as defamation that impacts someone's livelihood and business? That way, the legal consequences would be much more severe, possibly leading to a longer prison sentence than what you'd get for standard slander.]
[FatherOfCaduceus: @NorthernDuke, I have to agree with @EntertainmentKing on this one. His suggestion seems like a smart approach—going after them for defamation related to livelihood and business could really hit them where it hurts.]
[FatherOfCaduceus: It's not just about the reputation damage, but about tying it to real-world consequences. This could potentially lead to a harsher legal outcome, which might be a better deterrent than handling it like a regular slander case.]
