"So, you've interviewed all possible witnesses, correct," I asked detective Nikels. "That is correct," he responds. "Ok then, so, going off the knowledge bestowed upon us, why don't we have a single suspect detective?," I say as I flipped through all the possible suspects, or should I say lack of. Case work like this isn't out of the norm for me, but I seem to be a tad bit perplexed as how no suspects have been accused or brought in for questioning . Five witnesses. Five testimonies. Five crime scenes. "Alright, how about we start at the first one Nikels." Detective Nikels perks up at the mention of his name, but doesn't look my direction. "What are you Implying Max, that one of the witnesses know more then what they are putting on?," detective Nikels says."That's exactly what im implying here detective," I respond with a certainty.
(Here's my theory: one of these folks that have been questioned, have to be linked to the victims or killer in some type of way)(Now, there has to be something missing that the Sheriff's detective missed.) (What is someone hiding here or is this just an over exerted hunch?)
Alright then, who do we pull in first?
To be continued...….