```
He was preparing to face all that lay before his eyes, which still seemed to be a very obvious, and seemingly insurmountable, chasm.
Therefore, making any further attempts to face what he could not understand or to entangle himself more due to the recognition of his surroundings was not worth the conjecture it necessitated from others.
At this moment, his thoughts on the potential understanding of the problem happened to be the only result that could be accepted by people.
Understanding and entanglement thus no longer required any other special actions to judge the problem.
The remaining doubts, therefore, had to be addressed in more detail, leading to a more composed understanding of the problem.
Could he still perform an analysis that would make himself more satisfied with the response to the problem?
This kind of shared cognitive analysis of the problem, which seemed more detailed, what sort of judgment did it still need to undergo?
