Such speculation, faced with what is seen before one's eyes, led to one's own satisfactory understanding and clear action.
Then, everything done in response felt most appropriate, offering a simple and shared recognition of the problem, didn't it?
At that moment, if one were to quite hastily resist the problem from this very predicament,
the resulting composure in dealing with the problem could not yet be seen as the most appropriate.
With judgment and cognition almost aligned, one could under such simple and exceptionally clear understanding of the problem,
face different situations with a less than perfectly fitting understanding, and hence undertake a more detailed recognition of the circumstances.
Would problems and entanglements no longer need more hesitation in the remaining understanding that might prove worthwhile?
