In such circumstances, even if he were to continue providing reasonable explanations, if he gave the answer, the other party may not necessarily agree.
Sometimes the reason a question is a question is not because people do not know the answer.
On the contrary, it is highly possible that people want to understand what sort of significance the answer holds after knowing it?
It is for this reason that real issues arise.
The other party keeps a certain distance from him, with a vigilant feeling in their heart.
Therefore, under such circumstances, if he were to have a conflict or disagreement with the other party, it could very well mean a terrible situation.
Therefore, facing this, the elder knew that he could not continue to give straightforward explanations or clarifications.
Because continuing with straightforward explanations or clarifications did not bring any meaning.
Could the other party fully understand his explanations or clarifications? That was the crux of the issue.
