The answers that cannot be solved can only be repeatedly explained and manipulated under the clash of interests and ambitions.
If someone acts out of anger, even if the act is wrong, but the result is good, such a person can be defined as righteous.
Then, what about those who do the same act out of the same anger, but their actions do not yield any result?
How should such people be defined?
Such an answer seems insoluble, but insoluble answers can be acted upon and dealt with jealously.
A phenomenon exists in this world, wherein some individuals are unable to achieve their goals throughout their lives.
Just like trying to find this answer. Countless people are contemplating what actions are correct and what actions are wrong.
But in fact, this answer that cannot be solved does have an approach.
It is to try it out. The answer always comes after the attempt.
It seems rather disgraceful to define an answer that cannot be precisely concluded if you don't do anything at all.
