Nona's response was completely bureaucratic, perfect for a propaganda department script, perhaps even eloquently articulated by gifted writers to sound more righteous and imposing, like those legendary upright knights. It would then be followed by a fierce demonization of Mr. Labart, scrutinizing his race, lineage, culture, and history from various aspects to ascertain why a Charlemagne lower-level official would act such. Ultimately, it would assert the superiority of Alfheim through comparative analysis.
This trick had long been overplayed by the propaganda and intelligence departments; anyone with independent thinking capability and willingness to actually verify the facts could see the biases and deliberate guidances. Yet, the struggling people of Charlemagne were increasingly buying into it—especially against the backdrop where some officials often behaved even more unscrupulously than depicted in the propaganda.
