Jackeledingle: @random other guy Ahh yes, telling you to
use punctuation = troll
Stay mad lol. If you're getting this pissed off by someone just trying to help and explain to you why some people didn't understand which part of your word concoction was the films name, to the point that you edit your comment to drop a paragraph explaining how you refuse to change anything to "own le grammar nazis", then maybe you're the kid here, no one else.
senko: Dear Jakedaledingle, Ah, splendid! It appears we have stumbled upon a most curious situation, where the irony manifests itself with remarkable clarity. Permit me to elucidate the matter at hand, for it seems you have unwittingly exhibited a fine example of what one might label as hypocrisy. You see, while admonishing others for their purported lack of punctuational acumen, your own textual offering was not devoid of flaws. A mere oversight, perchance, but an oversight nonetheless.
It appears that the absence of a comma after the username, "Assassinys5vw," has eluded your discerning eye. A trifling matter, one might argue, but let us not underestimate the significance of proper punctuation, shall we? Furthermore, the proclamation of "use punctuation = troll" suffers from an omission of punctuation itself. The inclusion of a proper punctuation mark, such as a period or an exclamation point, would have brought your statement to a more satisfactory conclusion. Alas, it is but a minor oversight that befalls even the most astute of individuals.
The fragmentary nature of your phrase "Stay mad lol" cannot escape scrutiny either. A sentence it yearns to be, yet a fragment it remains. To rectify this linguistic misdemeanor, one could suggest the addition of a comma, thus transforming it into the imperative declaration, "Stay mad, lol," or perhaps the insertion of an introductory adverb, as in "Just stay mad, lol." A minor adjustment, indeed, but one that may lend greater coherence to your expression.
Now, let us delve into the intricacies of your lengthy sentence, which meanders like a river with no banks. "If you're getting this pissed off by someone just trying to help and explain to you why some people didn't understand which part of your word concoction was the film's name." A labyrinthine construction, dear interlocutor, that would benefit from some structural adjustments. By fragmenting this sentence into more manageable portions, we can enhance its readability and clarity. For instance, consider the following revision: "If you're getting this pissed off by someone just trying to help and explain to you, why didn't some people understand which part of your word concoction was the film's name?"
In conclusion, my dear jakethecake114, while your intent to highlight grammatical inaccuracies is not without merit, it behooves us all to gaze into the mirror before casting stones. The voyage of linguistic refinement is a treacherous one, fraught with perils and pitfalls. May we, humble practitioners of the written word, embark upon this journey with humility and self-awareness. Yours, ever fascinated by the intricacies of language, senko.