But others had a somewhat scalding opinion that they could never release no matter what.
Midas's ambition knew no bounds.
His gaze was fixed firmly upon the horizon of possibility and that was a good trait for a leader to have, but that was also a bad trait because, with his eyes fixed on the horizon, he might miss what was happening right at his feet.
With each revelation, he revealed himself to be a force to be reckoned with. This was good because it meant he was reliable, but it was bad because it meant he was capable of anything.
He was a master of strategy and a subterfuge whose cunning surpassed all expectations.
But was he trustworthy?
Was he the person they could put all their hopes and dreams on knowing that he was able to devise and lie the way he just did?
