From my perspective they are both good, you have to understand what they said again and again before you see the flaw.
These were good debates, which means that both of them did well with their rebuttals. Ms. Nayeli has been constantly saying that we can just punish criminals in any other way than killing. She also said that there are many ways but how come she only gave one and that was to let them serve in prison their entire life? It's a kind of punishment that is way harsher than the death penalty because it'll be like torture to them.
That's all she gave, so some of her words seem to lack thoughts and ideas.
