Several research institutions and medical professors also came to the same conclusion.
Now, no one dares to say that all of Zhao Yi's conjectures are correct; they can only say that "the experiment did not find any errors." Whether they are correct and how many are correct still need a large number of experiments to verify.
This is already enough.
The release of the new information immediately affected the direction of public opinion.
Zhao Yi's paper is indeed a very incomprehensible 'pathological mechanism conjecture', and all the conjectures are wrong, which can be described as 'nonsense'; is there a part that is correct?
If so, the conjecture would be very meaningful!
Using experiments to verify the conclusion is much easier than doing research. As long as a part of it is proven to be correct, Zhao Yi can be said to have made significant contributions to the research of the 'pathogenic mechanism of viral myocarditis'.
