I know, this book is not as intense as my other books let alone book 2. I don't think I'll ever be able to match the hype of book 2, nor should I try. One friend once told me that you should not try to match what you did but improve on it. Improving may be shaving off things you thought made a great piece, but beneath it all, nothing was holding it up. I don't want to just slap action on a book and use that as an excuse to cover up all the other flaws. That is why there is still action in here, but it's mainly character development and a little more natural occurring stuff. In book two, we followed the bad girl, Adalyn, and found out that she was just trying to protect others from the true bad guy, but they mistook her as it. Now, we're following the good guy, but with his past, people start mistaking him as the bad guy. Is it a mistake in identity though, or is he really the bad guy?