1. The Industrial Revolution and its consequences have

been a disaster for the human race. They have greatly

increased the life-expectancy of those of us who live in

"advanced" countries, but they have destabilized society,

have made life unfulfilling, have subjected human beings

to indignities, have led to widespread psychological suffering (in the Third World to physical suffering as well) and

have inflicted severe damage on the natural world. The

continued development of technology will worsen the situation. It will certainly subject human being to greater indignities and inflict greater damage on the natural world,

it will probably lead to greater social disruption and psychological suffering, and it may lead to increased physical

suffering even in "advanced" countries.

2. The industrial-technological system may survive or it

may break down. If it survives, it MAY eventually achieve

a low level of physical and psychological suffering, but

only after passing through a long and very painful period

of adjustment and only at the cost of permanently reducing human beings and many other living organisms to

engineered products and mere cogs in the social machine.

Furthermore, if the system survives, the consequences will

be inevitable: There is no way of reforming or modifying

the system so as to prevent it from depriving people of

dignity and autonomy.

3. If the system breaks down the consequences will still

be very painful. But the bigger the system grows the more

disastrous the results of its breakdown will be, so if it is

to break down it had best break down sooner rather than

later.

4. We therefore advocate a revolution against the industrial system. This revolution may or may not make use

of violence; it may be sudden or it may be a relatively

gradual process spanning a few decades. We can't predict

any of that. But we do outline in a very general way the

measures that those who hate the industrial system should

take in order to prepare the way for a revolution against

that form of society. This is not to be a POLITICAL revolution. Its object will be to overthrow not governments

but the economic and technological basis of the present

society.

5. In this article we give attention to only some of

the negative developments that have grown out of the

industrial-technological system. Other such developments

we mention only briefly or ignore altogether. This does not

mean that we regard these other developments as unimportant. For practical reasons we have to confine our discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which we have something new to say. For

example, since there are well-developed environmental

and wilderness movements, we have written very little

about environmental degradation or the destruction of

wild nature, even though we consider these to be highly

important.

THE PSYCHOLOGY OF MODERN LEFTISM

6. Almost everyone will agree that we live in a deeply

troubled society. One of the most widespread manifestations of the craziness of our world is leftism, so a discussion of the psychology of leftism can serve as an introduction to the discussion of the problems of modern society

in general.

7. But what is leftism? During the first half of the 20th

century leftism could have been practically identified with

socialism. Today the movement is fragmented and it is not

clear who can properly be called a leftist. When we speak

of leftists in this article we have in mind mainly socialists,

collectivists, "politically correct" types, feminists, gay and

disability activists, animal rights activists and the like. But

not everyone who is associated with one of these movements is a leftist. What we are trying to get at in discussing leftism is not so much movement or an ideology as a

psychological type, or rather a collection of related types.

Thus, what we mean by "leftism" will emerge more clearly

in the course of our discussion of leftist psychology. (Also,

see paragraphs 227-230.)

8. Even so, our conception of leftism will remain a good

deal less clear than we would wish, but there doesn't seem

to be any remedy for this. All we are trying to do here is

indicate in a rough and approximate way the two psychological tendencies that we believe are the main driving

force of modern leftism. We by no means claim to be telling the WHOLE truth about leftist psychology. Also, our

discussion is meant to apply to modern leftism only. We

leave open the question of the extent to which our discussion could be applied to the leftists of the 19th and early

20th centuries.

9. The two psychological tendencies that underlie modern leftism we call "feelings of inferiority" and "oversocialization". Feelings of inferiority are characteristic of

modern leftism as a whole, while oversocialization is characteristic only of a certain segment of modern leftism;

but this segment is highly influential.