At lunch, several people who had expressed dissatisfaction with Harrison Clark sat at the same table with Mendelson, Raulsen, and Ethan Evans.
As opinion leaders, their academic status was naturally not low, nearly on par with Raulsen and Mendelson.
At the dinner table, everyone inevitably discussed the disruptive concepts Harrison proposed that morning.
Everyone had their own opinions about these conceptual ideas within their respective fields of expertise.
Everyone felt a mix of emotions.
Their scientific knowledge and common sense were at war in their hearts.
From an academic perspective, there was nothing wrong with the theories that Harrison had presented in the morning.
These ideas belonged to the "conjectures" that could not be falsified nor proven at this stage.
It's not fair to say that conjectures have no value, and those who put forward conjectures have not contributed to science.
