There is so many great issues that was brought up during the court proceeding.
Those who studied the court proceeding would find the court proceeding even opens debate between the necessary of human experimentation in a world of change.
The debate itself is very compelling and make you feel in dilemma whether to support or not support human experimentation.
Does the promise of the future trumps the current present?
Does ethics holds back the development of science?
Does humanity matter that much in front of progress for the future development?
then if that is the case, for whose sake this progress is for? If it progress but have no humanity, then for what reason one would have to fight of progress?
Who is this progress for?
Such question would arise if you read the court proceeding where the lawyers and the prosecutor both argue their points.
